Seven Million Years, One Survivor
For most of seven million years several kinds of human lived at once; what fossils and ancient DNA show, and which dates are still argued over.
The oldest proposed member of the human lineage, Sahelanthropus tchadensis from Chad, lived between 7 and 6 million years ago, according to the Smithsonian Institution’s Human Origins Program. Set those 7 million years on a calendar that starts on January 1 and the first stone tools appear on July 12, the first hominins outside Africa on September 26, and Homo sapiens on December 15. The painted and stenciled rock art and the footprints in the Americas discussed below fall in the last four days of December (Exhibit 1).
1. Compress seven million years into one calendar year and Homo sapiens appears on December 15; the oldest dated rock art, on December 28
Source. Dates from the Smithsonian Human Origins Program and the papers linked in Sources; positions computed.
Full sizeMethod. Day of the year = 365 × (1 − years ago ÷ 7,000,000), counted from January 1 at 7 million years ago; 315,000 years ago falls on day 348.6.
For most of that time several kinds of human lived at once. Exhibit 2 charts 22 named species and the Denisovans; around 1.8 million years ago five of them overlapped. Homo sapiens is the only one of the 23 with no end date.
2. By the Smithsonian’s dates, five hominin species overlapped at 1.8 million years ago; Homo sapiens is the only one of the 23 groups charted with no end date
Source. Smithsonian Human Origins Program, species pages; Richter et al., 2017; Duval et al., 2018; Sutikna et al., 2016; Grün and Stringer, 2023; Fu et al., 2025.
Full sizeMethod. Bars span the earliest and latest dates the source gives; single dates are dots; an arrow marks a minimum age.
The family tree
The record falls into three stretches. From 7 to 4.4 million years ago it holds a few fragmentary candidates: Sahelanthropus, Orrorin and Ardipithecus. From 4.2 to about 2 million years ago the australopiths dominate it; Australopithecus afarensis, the species of the 1974 Lucy skeleton, is dated by the Smithsonian to 3.85–2.95 million years ago. The Paranthropus lineage, with heavy jaws and large back teeth, lived alongside early Homo for more than a million years; a 2026 paper reported a 2.6-million-year-old Paranthropus jaw from Mille-Logya in the Afar region of Ethiopia (Alemseged et al., 2026).
Homo appears by 2.8 million years ago, in a jaw from Ledi-Geraru, Ethiopia (Villmoare et al., 2015). A 2025 paper reported Homo teeth at the same site dated to 2.78 and 2.59 million years and an unnamed Australopithecus at 2.63 million, and concluded that the two lineages lived in the Afar at the same time before 2.5 million years ago (Villmoare et al., 2025). Homo sapiens dates to 315,000 ± 34,000 years at Jebel Irhoud, Morocco (Richter et al., 2017). In January 2026 a paper described hominins from Thomas Quarry I in Casablanca, about 773,000 years old, which its authors place near the base of the lineage that led to Homo sapiens (Hublin et al., 2026).
Some groups are known from a single site and date; others from long stretches of time. Among the 18 groups with a date range, Homo erectus spans the most, from 1.89 million to 110,000 years ago by the Smithsonian’s dates, and Homo floresiensis the least, 40,000 years of skeletal remains on Flores (Exhibit 3).
3. Homo erectus spans 1.78 million years in the record, the longest of the 18 groups with a date range; Homo sapiens so far spans 315,000
Source. Same dates as the previous exhibit.
Full sizeMethod. Span = earliest minus latest date; groups known from a single date are left out.
The older record is African. Every species in this study dated to more than 2.5 million years was found in Africa, and nine of the eleven African sites of that age in this study’s data are in Ethiopia, Kenya and Tanzania. The others are Toros-Menalla in Chad and Taung in South Africa.
Brains
Upright walking came millions of years before large brains. The Laetoli footprints show bipedal walking 3.66 million years ago (Smithsonian), and Lucy’s species had a brain “usually less than 500 cubic centimeters,” in the Smithsonian’s words. A 2018 analysis of 94 fossil crania dated from 3.2 million to about 345,000 years ago found the signal across hominins “consistent with a gradual increase in brain size,” 64 or 88 percent of it from change within lineages, depending on the taxonomy used (Du et al., 2018).
4. Fossil Homo crania average 723 cubic centimeters before 1.5 million years ago and 1,158 after 600,000 years ago
Source. Du et al., Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2018, Table S1 (94 crania, CC BY 4.0).
Full sizeMethod. Each dot is one cranium: the mean of its published volume estimates, at the midpoint of its date range. The black bars and their numbers are the means of the 21 Homo crania older than 1.5 million years and the 15 younger than 600,000.
Grouped by species, the averages in the same data run from 420 cubic centimeters for the single Australopithecus sediba cranium to 1,187 for the six Homo heidelbergensis crania. The 46 Homo erectus crania alone range from 546 to 1,300 (Exhibit 5).
5. Homo heidelbergensis crania average 1,187 cubic centimeters, 2.8 times the 428 of Australopithecus afarensis
Source. Du et al., 2018, Table S1.
Full sizeMethod. Each ring is one cranium; the bar marks each taxon’s mean of its crania in Table S1.
Size did not rise in every line. Homo floresiensis, with skeletal remains on Flores dated to 100,000–60,000 years ago (Sutikna et al., 2016), was small-bodied, and jaws and teeth from Mata Menge show small hominins on the island about 700,000 years ago (Brumm et al., 2016).
Tools, fire and art
Stone tools are older than the oldest Homo fossil. A 2015 paper dated knapped tools at Lomekwi 3, Kenya, to 3.3 million years (Harmand et al., 2015), about 500,000 years before the Ledi-Geraru jaw. The Smithsonian dates the start of Oldowan toolmaking, with hammerstones, cores and sharp flakes, to at least 2.6 million years ago. At Nyayanga, Kenya, Oldowan tools from deposits dated 3.03–2.60 million years lay with butchered hippopotamus bones and two Paranthropus molars; the authors did not assign the tools to a maker (Plummer et al., 2023). Acheulean hand-axes follow by about 1.76 million years ago, by the Smithsonian’s count. Burned bone and ashed plants in Wonderwerk Cave, South Africa, about 1 million years old, are what its excavators call “the earliest secure evidence for burning in an archaeological context” (Berna et al., 2012).
6. Knapped stone tools at Lomekwi are dated to 3.3 million years, about 500,000 years older than the oldest Homo fossil
Source. Harmand et al., 2015; Plummer et al., 2023; Smithsonian, Stone Tools; Berna et al., 2012; Richter et al., 2017; Berger et al., 2025; Henshilwood et al., 2018; Hoffmann et al., 2018; Oktaviana et al., 2026; Sümer et al., 2024.
Full sizeMethod. A line spans a published date range; an arrow marks a minimum age; open marks are disputed.
The oldest dated rock art is a hand stencil in Liang Metanduno on Muna Island, Indonesia, with a minimum age of 67,800 years (Oktaviana et al., 2026). No human remains were found with it. Paintings in three Spanish caves dated to more than 64,000 years were attributed to Neanderthals in 2018 because they predate the arrival of Homo sapiens in Europe (Hoffmann et al., 2018); the dating is disputed (Exhibit 9).
Leaving Africa
Hominins were at Dmanisi, Georgia, shortly after 1.85 million years ago (Ferring et al., 2011), at Gran Dolina in Spain between 949,000 and 772,000 years ago (Duval et al., 2018), on the island of Flores by 700,000 years ago (Brumm et al., 2016), and on Luzon in the Philippines about 709,000 years ago, the earliest known hominin activity there (Ingicco et al., 2018). For Homo sapiens the dates are younger and more contested. Genomes from Ranis, Germany, place Homo sapiens in central Europe about 45,000 years ago (Sümer et al., 2024).
Two arrivals are disputed. At Madjedbebe in northern Australia, occupation was dated to about 65,000 years (Clarkson et al., 2017); a 2018 review concluded that an age above 50,000 years is unlikely to be valid (O’Connell et al., 2018). At White Sands, New Mexico, footprints were dated to 23,000–21,000 years from seeds of the aquatic plant Ruppia (Bennett et al., 2021). Critics argued the seeds could read too old because of a hard-water reservoir effect, and proposed no alternative age (Madsen et al., 2022; Oviatt et al., 2023). Pollen and quartz luminescence dates gave 23,000–21,000 years (Pigati et al., 2023), and lake-mud dates 22,400–20,700 (Holliday et al., 2025).
The other humans
Neanderthals, Homo floresiensis and Homo sapiens all lived within the last 100,000 years, and a fourth group, the Denisovans, was until 2025 known mainly from DNA. In April 2025 a paper identified a jaw from the Penghu Channel, between Taiwan and the mainland, as Denisovan from its proteins (Tsutaya et al., 2025). In June and August papers identified the Harbin cranium, at least 146,000 years old, as Denisovan from mitochondrial DNA recovered from dental calculus (Fu et al., 2025, Cell) and from its proteome (Fu et al., 2025, Science). The cranium had been described in 2021 as a new species, Homo longi (Ji et al., 2021). In September a paper placed the Yunxian 2 skull, about 1 million years old, in the Homo longi clade (Feng et al., 2025).
Living people carry part of that history. A 2024 study of more than 300 genomes spanning the past 50,000 years traced most Neanderthal ancestry in living non-Africans to a single extended period of gene flow between 50,500 and 43,500 years ago (Iasi et al., 2024); a second study, of the oldest Homo sapiens genomes yet sequenced, from Ranis and Zlatý kůň, placed it at about 49,000–45,000 (Sümer et al., 2024). A 2021 study found the highest Denisovan ancestry measured in the Ayta Magbukon of the Philippines, 30 to 40 percent above that of Australians and Papuans (Larena et al., 2021).
7. Two 2024 studies place the Neanderthal gene flow shared by living non-Africans between about 50,500 and 43,500 years ago
Source. Iasi et al., Science, 2024; Sümer et al., Nature, 2024.
Full sizeWhere the dates disagree
Nine dates and claims in this study are disputed or have been revised. Four are disputes over evidence: White Sands, Madjedbebe, the Spanish paintings and burial by Homo naledi, which its finders claimed (Berger et al., 2025) and others reject (Martinón-Torres et al., 2024). One is a naming question (Harbin), and one an age not yet settled between two ranges (Penghu 1). Three are revisions by later dating, each older than the first estimate: Homo luzonensis from at least 67,000 to at least 130,000 years (Grün and Stringer, 2023), Omo I from 195,000 (McDougall, Brown and Fleagle, 2005) to at least 233,000 (Vidal et al., 2022), and Jebel Irhoud from about 160,000 (Smith et al., 2007) to 315,000 (Richter et al., 2017; Exhibit 8).
8. Three redatings since 2017 made fossils older; the Madjedbebe dispute turns on whether occupation is older than 50,000 years
Source. The papers named in the next exhibit, linked in Sources.
Full sizeMethod. An arrow marks a minimum (pointing older) or a maximum (pointing younger); the year is the year of publication.
9. Of nine disputed or revised dates and claims, later dating made three older; four remain disputed over the evidence
| Date or claim | What was claimed | Claimed by | The other position | Disputed or revised by | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First people in the Americas (White Sands footprints) | 23,000–21,000 years; supported by pollen and luminescence dates (23,000–21,000) and lake-mud dates (22,400–20,700) | Bennett et al., Science, 2021; Pigati et al., Science, 2023; Holliday et al., Science Advances, 2025 | No alternative age proposed; the dated seeds may read too old because of a hard-water reservoir effect (a 1947 sample from Malpais Spring gave about 7,400 years) | Madsen et al., Science, 2022; Oviatt et al., Quaternary Research, 2023 | disputed |
| First people in Sahul (Madjedbebe) | About 65,000 years | Clarkson et al., Nature, 2017 | An age above 50,000 years is unlikely; main dispersal from Africa 55,000–50,000 years ago | O'Connell et al., PNAS, 2018 | disputed |
| Neanderthal cave paintings in Spain | Older than 64,000 years, before Homo sapiens reached Europe, so made by Neanderthals | Hoffmann et al., Science, 2018 | No alternative age proposed; uranium–thorium dates on crusts can overstate age if uranium leached out | White, Bosinski and Bourrillon, Journal of Human Evolution, 2020 | disputed |
| Burial and engraving by Homo naledi | Deliberate burials and engravings, 335,000–236,000 years ago | Berger et al., eLife, 2025 | Dates not disputed; no scientific evidence of burial or rock art | Martinón-Torres, Garate, Herries and Petraglia, Journal of Human Evolution, 2024 | disputed |
| Name of the Harbin population | A new species, Homo longi | Ji et al., The Innovation, 2021 | Denisovan, by mitochondrial DNA and proteins | Fu et al., Cell, 2025; Fu et al., Science, 2025 | disputed |
| Age of Penghu 1 | 10,000–70,000 or 130,000–190,000 years (two ranges) | Chang et al., Nature Communications, 2015 | Unresolved between the two ranges | Tsutaya et al., Science, 2025 (identification only) | unresolved |
| Age of Homo luzonensis | At least 50,000 and 67,000 years | Détroit et al., Nature, 2019 | At least 130,000 years | Grün and Stringer, Quaternary Science Reviews, 2023 | revised |
| Age of Omo I, Homo sapiens | 195,000 ± 5,000 years | McDougall, Brown and Fleagle, Nature, 2005 | At least 233,000 ± 22,000 years | Vidal et al., Nature, 2022 | revised |
| Age of the Jebel Irhoud fossils | About 160,000 years (electron spin resonance, as used in 2007) | Smith et al., PNAS, 2007 | 315,000 ± 34,000 years (thermoluminescence) | Richter et al., Nature, 2017 | revised |
Source. The papers named in each row, linked in Sources.
Full sizeThe breakthroughs
For 150 years the record grew by fossil: the Neander Valley in 1856, Java in 1891, Taung in 1924, Lucy in 1974. From 2010 it grew also by molecule. That year a draft Neanderthal genome showed that living non-Africans carry Neanderthal DNA (Green et al., 2010), and DNA from a finger bone identified the Denisovans (Krause et al., 2010; Reich et al., 2010).
10. Of the 26 finds listed, 17 came in 2010 or later; five of those rested on DNA or proteins
Source. The papers and Smithsonian species pages linked in Sources.
Full sizeThe Allen Ancient DNA Resource, a curated compendium of published ancient genomes, held genome-wide data on more than 10,000 ancient individuals at the end of 2022 (Mallick et al., 2024) and on 17,634 in its release of April 13, 2026 (release v66.0).
11. Ancient individuals with genome-wide data: more than 10,000 at the end of 2022, 17,634 in April 2026
Source. Allen Ancient DNA Resource: Mallick et al., Scientific Data, 2024; release v62.0 (2025 paper); release v66.0 information page.
Full sizeLimitations (10)
- Unverified. A 2025 argument that genetics places the settlement of Sahul after about 50,000 years ago (Allen and O’Connell, Archaeology in Oceania) was seen only in a news summary and is not cited.
- Unverified. A published comment questioning the Denisovan identification of Penghu 1 (Science, 2025) was seen only secondhand and is not cited.
- Unverified. The maker of the Muna hand stencil: no human remains were found with it (Oktaviana et al., 2026).
- Unverified. When fire came under control, as distinct from the earliest burning at Wonderwerk (Berna et al., 2012): the sources read do not date it.
- Conflicting sources. The Smithsonian’s Homo habilis page gives the species’ end as 1.4 million years in its summary and 1.65 million in its text; Exhibits 2 and 3 use 1.4 million.
- Conflicting sources. The Smithsonian’s Stone Tools page dates Oldowan toolmaking to at least 2.6 million years ago; Plummer et al. (2023) report Oldowan tools at Nyayanga in deposits of 3.03–2.60 million years.
- Coverage. Du et al. (2018), the source of Exhibits 4 and 5, excludes Homo sapiens and Neanderthals and ends at about 345,000 years ago.
- Coverage. Species not charted in Exhibit 2 include Australopithecus garhi and Australopithecus deyiremeda; their dates were not checked.
- Method. Exhibit 1 maps years to calendar days by straight proportion; Exhibit 3 leaves out groups known from a single date; Exhibit 4 places each cranium at the midpoint of its date range.
- Revisions. The Allen Ancient DNA Resource adds individuals with each release (Exhibit 11), and any date in this study may be revised by later dating, as three in Exhibit 8 were.
Sources (47)
- Alemseged et al.: “Afar fossil shows broad distribution and versatility of Paranthropus,” Nature 650 (2026): 381–388
- Allen Ancient DNA Resource: Harvard Dataverse, doi:10.7910/DVN/FFIDCW
- Bennett et al.: “Evidence of humans in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum,” Science 373 (2021)
- Berger et al.: “Evidence for deliberate burial of the dead by Homo naledi,” eLife 12 (2025): RP89106; “Homo naledi, a new species of the genus Homo,” eLife 4 (2015)
- Berna et al.: “Microstratigraphic evidence of in situ fire in the Acheulean strata of Wonderwerk Cave,” PNAS 109 (2012)
- Brown et al.: “A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia,” Nature 431 (2004)
- Brumm et al.: “Age and context of the oldest known hominin fossils from Flores,” Nature 534 (2016): 249–253
- Cann, Stoneking and Wilson: “Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution,” Nature 325 (1987): 31–36
- Chang et al.: “The first archaic Homo from Taiwan,” Nature Communications 6 (2015)
- Clarkson et al.: “Human occupation of northern Australia by 65,000 years ago,” Nature 547 (2017): 306–310
- Du et al.: “Pattern and process in hominin brain size evolution are scale-dependent,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 285 (2018): 20172738; Table S1 (figshare, CC BY 4.0)
- Duval et al.: “The first direct ESR dating of a hominin tooth from Atapuerca Gran Dolina TD-6,” Quaternary Geochronology 47 (2018): 120–137
- Détroit et al.: “A new species of Homo from the Late Pleistocene of the Philippines,” Nature 568 (2019): 181–186
- Feng et al.: “The phylogenetic position of the Yunxian cranium elucidates the origin of Homo longi,” Science 389 (2025): 1320–1324
- Ferring et al.: “Earliest human occupations at Dmanisi (Georgian Caucasus) dated to 1.85–1.78 Ma,” PNAS 108 (2011): 10432–10436
- Fu et al.: “Denisovan mitochondrial DNA from dental calculus of the >146,000-year-old Harbin cranium,” Cell 188 (2025): 3919–3926; “The proteome of the late Middle Pleistocene Harbin individual,” Science 389 (2025): 704–707
- Green et al.: “A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome,” Science 328 (2010): 710–722
- Grün and Stringer: “Direct dating of human fossils and the ever-changing story of human evolution,” Quaternary Science Reviews 322 (2023): 108379
- Harmand et al.: “3.3-million-year-old stone tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana, Kenya,” Nature 521 (2015): 310–315
- Henshilwood et al.: “An abstract drawing from the 73,000-year-old levels at Blombos Cave, South Africa,” Nature 562 (2018): 115–118
- Hoffmann et al.: “U-Th dating of carbonate crusts reveals Neandertal origin of Iberian cave art,” Science 359 (2018): 912–915
- Holliday et al.: “Paleolake geochronology supports Last Glacial Maximum age for human tracks at White Sands, New Mexico,” Science Advances 11 (2025): eadv4951
- Hublin et al.: “Early hominins from Morocco basal to the Homo sapiens lineage,” Nature 649 (2026): 902–908
- Iasi et al.: “Neanderthal ancestry through time: Insights from genomes of ancient and present-day humans,” Science 386 (2024): eadq3010
- Ingicco et al.: “Earliest known hominin activity in the Philippines by 709 thousand years ago,” Nature 557 (2018): 233–237
- Ji et al.: “Late Middle Pleistocene Harbin cranium represents a new Homo species,” The Innovation 2 (2021): 100132
- Krause et al.: “The complete mitochondrial DNA genome of an unknown hominin from southern Siberia,” Nature 464 (2010): 894–897
- Larena et al.: “Philippine Ayta possess the highest level of Denisovan ancestry in the world,” Current Biology 31 (2021): 4219–4230
- Madsen et al.: “Comment on ‘Evidence of humans in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum’,” Science 375 (2022): eabm4678
- Mallick et al.: “The Allen Ancient DNA Resource (AADR),” Scientific Data 11 (2024); AADR Visualizer, Bioinformatics Advances 5 (2025); AADR Visualizer, release v66.0 information page
- Martinón-Torres, Garate, Herries and Petraglia: “No scientific evidence that Homo naledi buried their dead and produced rock art,” Journal of Human Evolution 195 (2024): 103464
- McDougall, Brown and Fleagle: “Stratigraphic placement and age of modern humans from Kibish, Ethiopia,” Nature 433 (2005): 733–736
- O’Connell et al.: “When did Homo sapiens first reach Southeast Asia and Sahul?” PNAS 115 (2018): 8482–8490
- Oktaviana et al.: “Rock art from at least 67,800 years ago in Sulawesi,” Nature 650 (2026): 652–656
- Oviatt, Madsen, Rhode and Davis: “A critical assessment of claims that human footprints in the Lake Otero basin, New Mexico date to the Last Glacial Maximum,” Quaternary Research 111 (2023): 138–147
- Pigati et al.: “Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands,” Science 382 (2023): 73–75
- Plummer et al.: “Expanded geographic distribution and dietary strategies of the earliest Oldowan hominins and Paranthropus,” Science 379 (2023): 561–566
- Reich et al.: “Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia,” Nature 468 (2010): 1053–1060
- Richter et al.: “The age of the hominin fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the origins of the Middle Stone Age,” Nature 546 (2017): 293–296
- Smith et al.: “Earliest evidence of modern human life history in North African early Homo sapiens,” PNAS 104 (2007): 6128–6133
- Smithsonian Institution: Human Origins Program, species pages; Stone Tools
- Sutikna et al.: “Revised stratigraphy and chronology for Homo floresiensis at Liang Bua in Indonesia,” Nature 532 (2016): 366–369
- Sümer et al.: “Earliest modern human genomes constrain timing of Neanderthal admixture,” Nature 638 (2024): 711–717
- Tsutaya et al.: “A male Denisovan mandible from Pleistocene Taiwan,” Science 388 (2025): 176–180
- Vidal et al.: “Age of the oldest known Homo sapiens from eastern Africa,” Nature 601 (2022): 579–583
- Villmoare et al.: “Early Homo at 2.8 Ma from Ledi-Geraru, Afar, Ethiopia,” Science 347 (2015): 1352–1355; “New discoveries of Australopithecus and Homo from Ledi-Geraru, Ethiopia,” Nature 650 (2025): 374–380
- White, Bosinski and Bourrillon: “Still no archaeological evidence that Neanderthals created Iberian cave art,” Journal of Human Evolution 144 (2020): 102640
Read next
- The Higgins of Cane River The Higgins of Cane River gave their name to a Yancey County community; one line is traced by inference to a 1788 tax list in what is now Tennessee.
- What Congress Ran On, Tried and Did, 1947–2026 Ten parts on Congress since 1947: fewer, longer laws, separated parties, a moved cloture threshold and thinner committees.